What your quarterly report looks like

Synthetic demonstration only — not customer results.

Synthetic example company

Snack/protein bars · Quarter starting 2026-07-01

Fixed cohort · provisional minimum 5 distinct employees per reported group

Compare products within the same survey and protocol. Unmatched observations are descriptive comparisons; paired results come from employees who evaluated both products.

Example cocoa protein bar

owned · individual · survey 1.0

15 distinct employees · 15 evaluations. Repeats do not count as independent tasters.

overall

7.00 / 9

15 distinct tasters

633.3%
733.3%
833.3%

flavor

7.00 / 9

15 distinct tasters

Distribution withheld to protect small and complementary groups.

texture

6.00 / 9

15 distinct tasters

Distribution withheld to protect small and complementary groups.

aftertaste

6.00 / 9

15 distinct tasters

Distribution withheld to protect small and complementary groups.

Just-about-right diagnostics

The midpoint is “just right.” Higher is not better.

sweetness

15 distinct tasters

Too low33.3%
Just right33.3%
Too high33.3%

firmness

15 distinct tasters

Distribution withheld to protect small and complementary groups.

moistness

15 distinct tasters

Distribution withheld to protect small and complementary groups.

Withheld: no disclosure-reviewed group themes have been published.

Example competitor bar

competitor · individual · survey 1.0

Not enough responses to report anonymously

Paired preference

Not enough responses to report anonymously

Interpretation and privacy

Synthetic illustration, not customer results. Employee observations are not representative consumer preference research, blind testing, or laboratory quality or safety certification. Paired and unmatched comparisons are kept separate. Higher JAR values are not better.

Only fixed quarterly cohorts are published. Small and complementary groups are withheld. No employee identifiers, photos, retailer or lot details, exact submission dates or verbatim comments are included. The provisional five-person minimum does not eliminate all inference risk.